http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/ Looking at the Sox Stars of Tomorrow Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:57:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-200 Dan Santaromita Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:16:48 +0000 http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1854#comment-200 Yeah, the turnover has been impressive. Baseball America's 2013 projected lineup (which assumes no trades) had Danks, Mitchell, Flowers, Morel and Hudson on there. With Beckham, Quentin and the mostly young starting rotation I really like the future. The Sox don't need all of these prospects to be big hits, probably don't even need half and that's a great position to be in. Yeah, the turnover has been impressive. Baseball America’s 2013 projected lineup (which assumes no trades) had Danks, Mitchell, Flowers, Morel and Hudson on there. With Beckham, Quentin and the mostly young starting rotation I really like the future. The Sox don’t need all of these prospects to be big hits, probably don’t even need half and that’s a great position to be in.

]]> http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-199 striker Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:40:07 +0000 http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1854#comment-199 Interesting that most of our top 5 prospects haven't been in our organization for over a year. Viciedo, Flowers, Hudson, MItchell, Thompson. I think that is a solid group of prospects. Interesting that most of our top 5 prospects haven’t been in our organization for over a year. Viciedo, Flowers, Hudson, MItchell, Thompson. I think that is a solid group of prospects.

]]> http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-198 John Norris Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:07:39 +0000 http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1854#comment-198 I like our list, but I'm partial. I like our list, but I’m partial.

]]>