<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FutureSox.com &#187; Trayce Thompson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/tag/trayce-thompson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage</link>
	<description>Looking at the Sox Stars of Tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TotalZone Updates</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/02/11/totalzone-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/02/11/totalzone-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Retherford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Escobar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Gartrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take a look at how 10 of the White Sox' top positional prospects stack up by TotalZone, and then compare that to their scouting reports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Smith’s TotalZone metric was recently updated over at minorleaguesplits.com to incorporate the second half of the season. I’m gong to take a look at the Sox’ top positional prospects to see how their defense grades out by the numbers, and then compare that to the scouting reports.</p>
<p>Note: catchers not included<br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/10/jared-mitchell/">1.	Jared Mitchell, OF</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/1854/mitchell.jpg" alt="mitchell" /><br />
-5 runs for Jared Mitchell in a small sample size (34 games) doesn’t sound great, but you have to remember that he didn’t play centre field in college and so the adjustment may take some time. The scouting reports are very positive as Mitchell’s speed allows him to cover a lot of ground and get to balls that other centre fielders could only dream of reaching. Kannapolis manager Ernie Young was quoted as saying &#8220;He takes control in center field like he&#8217;s been playing professionally for a while.”</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/01/dayan-viciedo/">2.	Dayan Viciedo, 3B/1B</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/1773/dayan.jpg" alt="viciedo" /><br />
Much has been made of Dayan Viciedo’s poor defensive ability, but as you can see, TotalZone likes him and had him pegged as a +4 run fielder over 130 games. It is expected that Viciedo will make the transition to first base this year, likely starting at Charlotte, and he certainly made his fair share of errors last year, but TZ indicates he may have had a future at 3B. The scouts disagree citing his lack of range and concentration as his main flaws.<br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/07/jordan-danks/">3.	Jordan Danks, OF</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/8255/danks.jpg" alt="danks" /><br />
Jordan Danks’ defensive performances have been something of a mixed bag going by TotalZone. For the year he was a -2 run defender in centre field and a -1 run defender in left field. Last year he was a +2 run defender in CF, which would make him a fairly neutral defender (+0 runs) career in CF (107 games). The scouting reports are more positive however with Baseball America saying “he the range and instincts to play center field.” He may never be the gold glover that some people seem to expect, but he should prove a very capable defensive outfielder.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/08/05/brent-morel/">4.	Brent Morel, 3B</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/8493/morel.jpg" alt="morel" /><br />
Brent Morel is a case of stats and scouting coming together perfectly to form the same conclusion on a player. Morel’s TotalZone at 3B this year was an impressive +9 runs (128 games). The scouting reports indicate that Morel has good agility and quickness at the position with a plus arm. I’m still not convinced that Morel has the power that you would typically want from your third baseman but his defensive ability should make up for any shortcoming that he may have with the bat.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/28/trayce-thompson/">5.	Trayce Thompson, OF</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/531/thompson.jpg" alt="thompson" /><br />
As with Jared Mitchell, there isn’t anywhere near enough data to draw any real conclusions on Trayce Thompson’s defensive ability but to stop people from asking about him, I decided to just include him. Thompson’s TotalZone in 31 games playing centre was +2 (+9.7 per 150). The scouting reports state that Thompson has the range to play centre with the arm to play right. As he fills out I’d expect Trayce to make the gradual shift to RF, but for now he should be a very adequate CF.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/13/c-j-retherford/">6.	C.J. Retherford, 2B</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/5946/99655623.jpg" alt="retherford" /><br />
Retherford moved from third base to second base last year and he held his own considering it was a new position to him, however, the -2 TZ that Retherford posted at 2B was a lot worse than what he managed at 3B over the previous two years, where he ranked as a +13 run defender. I don’t mind the shift in position though as I see him as a future utility man meaning that defensive flexibility is a must for him, there is even talk that he will see time at catcher during spring training. The scouting reports indicate that Retherford is an average defensive 2B, who doesn’t have the range to play SS, which sounds pretty accurate to me.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/13/john-shelby/">7.	John Shelby, OF</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/2830/shelby.jpg" alt="shelby" /><br />
John Shelby fell out of favour with most message boarders this past year due to his lack of offense, but his defense in the outfield has gotten progressively better since he made the transition in ’07 according to TotalZone. In ’07 Shelby was a -10 run defender, in ’08 a +4 run defender and in ’09 a +15 run defender. The scouting reports aren’t quite as complimentary, however, as they indicate that Shelby is more of a league average defender.<br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/19/christian-marrero/">8.	Christian Marrero, 1B/OF</a></strong><br />
<img src="http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/6739/marrerou.jpg" alt="marrero" /><br />
Christian, the lesser-hyped Marrero brother, has steadily produced since being drafted in 2005 and is starting to force himself onto the prospect radar. Marrero hasn’t yet found a defensive home as he has split his time between RF, LF and 1B, but if this year is anything to go by, the outfield looks like his better position. In 84 games playing the outfield his TotalZone was an impressive +10 runs as compared to his -7 runs playing 36 games at 1B. There don’t seem to be many scouting reports floating around on Marrero’s defensive ability, but I have heard that he has the arm to play RF and Buddy Bell reportedly likes him a lot.</p>
<p><strong>9.	Stefan Gartrell, OF</strong><br />
<img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/965/gartrell.jpg" alt="gartrell" /><br />
Prior to this year Gartrell’s TotalZone numbers were pretty good, with him coming in at +17 runs between 06 and 08. This year, however, his TotalZone was a terrible -15 runs in right field (107 games). This poor performance last year is likely due to random fluctuation caused by a small sample size and deferring to his career average should give us a better idea of his defensive ability. The scouting reports paint him as an average defender at best. </p>
<p><strong>10.	 Eduardo Escobar, SS</strong><br />
<img src="http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/9649/eescobar.jpg" alt="escobar" /><br />
Eduardo Escobar has drawn rave reviews for his defensive ability from scouts and it’s just as well because he doesn’t project to be much more than a contact hitter with the bat. Scouts cite Escobar’s good range, excellent hands and a solid arm as his main strengths. TotalZone agrees with the scouts as Escobar scores well by this metric. Last year he was a +7 run defender at short and for his career he is +17 runs above average at SS (194 games). Escobar has drawn comparisons to both Omar Vizquel and Ozzie Guillen. While I wouldn’t expect him to be anywhere near as good defensively as Vizquel, he is that type of player (all glove, no bat).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/02/11/totalzone-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Prospect Rankings</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Santaromita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Retherford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Shirek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clevelan Santeliz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Infante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Phegley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santos Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Baseball America released their top ten prospect rankings for the White Sox.  This means all of the major prospect publications have released their White Sox rankings.  Let's take a look at the differences from each and try to figure out what it all means.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Baseball America released their top ten prospect rankings for the White Sox.  This means all of the major prospect publications have released their White Sox rankings.  Let&#8217;s take a look at the differences from each and try to figure out what it all means.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve gathered six White Sox top 10s from <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2010/269333.html">Baseball America</a>, <a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9776">Baseball Prospectus</a>, <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/chicago-white-sox-top-10-prospects">Fan Graphs</a>, John Sickels&#8217; <a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/9/1194068/chicago-whitesox-top-20-prospects">Minor League Ball</a>, <a href="http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/2009/12/team-26-chicago-white-sox.html">Diamond Futures</a> and our <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/11/2009-postseason-top-25-prospects/">own postseason rankings</a>.  Fan Graphs does things a little differently, they don&#8217;t include 2009 rookies in their rankings due to a lack of sample size, so you have to take that into account.</p>
<table width="600" border="1" cellspacing="1.5">
<tr>
<th><center><a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2010/269333.html">Baseball America</a></center></th>
<th><center><a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9776">Baseball Prospectus</a></center></th>
<th><center><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/chicago-white-sox-top-10-prospects">Fan Graphs</a></center></th>
<th><center><a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/9/1194068/chicago-whitesox-top-20-prospects">John Sickels</a></center></th>
<th><center><a href="http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/2009/12/team-26-chicago-white-sox.html">Diamond Futures</a></center></th>
<th><center><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/11/2009-postseason-top-25-prospects/">FutureSox</a></center></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Mitchell</td>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
<td>Jared Mitchell</td>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
<td>Jared Mitchell</td>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dan Hudson</td>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
<td>Jared Mitchell</td>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
<td>Tyler Flowers</td>
<td>C.J. Retherford</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trayce Thompson</td>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
<td>C.J. Retherford</td>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
<td>Jordan Danks</td>
<td>Jared Mitchell</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dayan Viciedo</td>
<td>Clevelan Santeliz</td>
<td>Clevelan Santeliz</td>
<td>David Holmberg</td>
<td>Clevelan Santeliz</td>
<td>Brent Morel</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Holmberg</td>
<td>Trayce Thompson</td>
<td>John Ely</td>
<td>C.J. Retherford</td>
<td>Miguel Gonzalez</td>
<td>Charlie Shirek</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clevelan Santeliz</td>
<td>Santos Rodriguez</td>
<td>Gregory Infante</td>
<td>Christian Marrero</td>
<td>Josh Phegley</td>
<td>Trayce Thompson</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miguel Gonzalez</td>
<td>David Holmberg</td>
<td>Santos Rodriguez</td>
<td>Santos Rodriguez</td>
<td>John Shelby</td>
<td>Josh Phegley</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>For starters, Baseball America gave us a minor surprise by making <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=775">Jared Mitchell</a> number 1.  Phil Rogers, who has a big hand in the White Sox rankings, said he thinks <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=465">Dan Hudson</a> will be as good as Jered Weaver.  Hudson was only third, the lowest of any of the lists, so that really shows how much they love Mitchell at BA.  When Kevin Goldstein of Baseball Prospectus <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/08/futuresox-interview-with-kevin-goldstein/">talked with us</a>, he gushed about Mitchell so it&#8217;s no surprise they also had him up there at two.  A few of our voters tend to be conservative with players in the lower levels of the system so Mitchell coming in lowest here isn&#8217;t a major shock.  A solid start to his 2010 will certainly have him in the top three of our 2010 midseason rankings (not to mention the possible graduations of Hudson and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=446">Tyler Flowers</a>).</p>
<p>As for Hudson and Flowers, there&#8217;s a near consensus to have them in the top three as there should be.  We picked Flowers over Hudson (barely) and my personal rationale for that pick was because of the positional value of a catcher.  Half of the rankings had Hudson higher, half had Flowers higher and I don&#8217;t think you can go wrong either way.</p>
<p><a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1176">Brent Morel</a> is interesting to me because he was seventh on our list and I felt that was too high.  None of our voters had Morel in the top five, yet four of these publications had Morel fourth.  Us and Diamond Futures are the only to have <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=441">Dayan Viciedo</a> above Morel and Diamond Futures makes the best pro-Viciedo argument you will find:</p>
<blockquote><p>Viciedo played the entire season as a 20yo in AA, and posted, park-adjusted, League average numbers across the board. That was good enough to finish #13 in the League among hitters in our 2009 Performance rankings—despite it being his U.S. debut. But that only tells part of the story, as Viciedo posted a park-neutral OPS of .853 after mid-July. For a frame of reference, that was the same as Josh Bell’s SOL numbers in what was considered a breakout season, and Josh Bell is two and one-half years older&#8230;What we are saying is that we expect him to perform similar in 2010 to the second-half of 2009, and when you give him that half-year adjustment, his numbers put him in the Top 100 prospect range—which is a heckuva a lot better than his detractors would like you to believe.</p></blockquote>
<p>Simply put, Viciedo has more upside than Morel and the lofty expectations compared to his results and reality may have too many people unfairly down on him.</p>
<p>Santos Rodriguez and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1581">David Holmberg</a> appeared on multiple top tens and didn&#8217;t even crack our top 25.  Granted, Holmberg was #26 and appeared on everyone&#8217;s ballot except one, but that is a drastic difference in opinion.  Again, our voters tend to stay conservative on rookies, but another factor is that Holmberg throws below 90 giving him two factors going against him.  He has a strong curve and changeup, but he is going to have to add some velocity on his fastball to be a top 10 prospect in my mind.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to have different perspectives, especially when a few of these publications have different ways of evaluating prospects.  All together there were 17 different prospects in these top ten lists.  If nothing else that should show that beyond the top tier or two it&#8217;s all about what type of player you prefer.  Tell us which rankings you like best in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2010/01/04/comparing-prospect-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Postseason Top 25 Prospects</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/11/2009-postseason-top-25-prospects/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/11/2009-postseason-top-25-prospects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FutureSox Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady Shoemaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Hynick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Retherford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Torres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie leesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Shirek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clevelan Santeliz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Remenowsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Holmberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Escobar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernando Hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Infante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jhonny Nunez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Serafin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gilmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Phegley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Bellamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Colligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Heidenreich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevin Griffith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Ciolli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Buch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santos Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Loman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Gartrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Sauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Upchurch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The minor league season is over for White Sox affiliates.  Before the Arizona Fall League starts and trades change up the players in the system, FutureSox releases our Postseason Top 25 Prospects to kick off our season in review coverage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The minor league season is over after a dreadful 1-10 combined playoff record from four White Sox affiliates.  With that, it&#8217;s time to kick off our season in review coverage with our Postseason Top 25 Prospects.  Per usual, we had a combination of nine FutureSox writers and people who follow the Sox minor league system from our sister site, Soxtalk.com, pool their ballots like an AP Poll. As a result, the rankings are a combination of each of our rankings and don’t reflect any of our individual opinions.</p>
<p>The previous rank is in reference to our <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=838">Midseason Top 25</a>.  Player profiles are linked in the player&#8217;s name if the player has one.  Tell us what you love and hate about the rankings in the comments section or join the discussion at Soxtalk!</p>
<p><strong>1. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=446">Tyler Flowers</a></strong>, C, White Sox<br />
Previous: 1st</p>
<p><strong>2. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=465">Dan Hudson</a></strong>, RH SP, White Sox<br />
Previous: 4th</p>
<p><strong>3. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=441">Dayan Viciedo</a></strong>, 3B, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 2nd</p>
<p><strong>4. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=450">Jordan Danks</a></strong>, CF, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 3rd</p>
<p><strong>5. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=597">C.J. Retherford</a></strong>, 2B/3B, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 11th</p>
<p><strong>6. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=775">Jared Mitchell</a></strong>, OF, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Previous: 5th</p>
<p><strong>7. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1176">Brent Morel</a></strong>, 3B, High-A Winston-Salem<br />
Previous: 17th</p>
<p><strong>8. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=583">Charlie Shirek</a></strong>, RH SP, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 10th</p>
<p><strong>9. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1071">Trayce Thompson</a></strong>, OF, Rookie Great Falls<br />
Previous: Not yet signed (He would have been 13th if he had)</p>
<p><strong>10. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=611">Josh Phegley</a></strong>, C, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Previous: 8th</p>
<p><strong>11. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=609">Carlos Torres</a></strong>, RH SP, White Sox<br />
Previous: 14th</p>
<p><strong>12. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/14/jhonny-nunez/">Jhonny Nunez</a></strong>, RH RP, White Sox<br />
Previous: 25th</p>
<p><strong>13. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1212">John Ely</a></strong>, RH SP, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 19th</p>
<p><strong>14. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/19/christian-marrero/">Christian Marrero</a></strong>, OF/1B, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>15. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=453">John Shelby III</a></strong>, OF, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: 7th</p>
<p><strong>16. Stefan Gartrell</strong>, OF, AAA Charlotte<br />
Previous: 23rd</p>
<p><strong>17. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=623">Nathan Jones</a></strong>, RH RP, High-A Winston-Salem<br />
Previous: 12th</p>
<p><strong>18. Charlie Leesman</strong>, LH SP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Previous: 20th</p>
<p><strong>19. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1523">Kyle Bellamy</a></strong>, RH RP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>20. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1019">Lucas Harrell</a></strong>, RH SP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Previous: 15th</p>
<p><strong>21. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=621">Stephen Sauer</a></strong>, RH SP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Previous: 23rd</p>
<p><strong>22. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1569">Jon Link</a></strong>, RH RP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Previous: 13th</p>
<p><strong>23. <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=652">Steven Upchurch</a></strong>, RH SP, Rookie Bristol<br />
Previous: 16th</p>
<p><strong>24. Brandon Hynick</strong>, RH SP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Previous: Not yet in system</p>
<p><strong>25. Clevelan Santeliz</strong>, RH RP, AA Birmingham<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>Others receiving votes, in order of points/votes received:</strong> <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1581">David Holmberg</a>, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1507">Jon Gilmore</a>, Miguel Gonzalez, Dan Remenowsky, Santos Rodriguez, Nevin Griffith, Eduardo Escobar, Brady Shoemaker, Nick Ciolli, Joe Serafin, Ryan Buch, Matt Heidenreich, Kyle Colligan, Gregory Infante, Jim Gallagher, Fernando Hernandez, Brandon Short, Seth Loman</p>
<p>Prospects previously ranked, still in the system from but received no votes this time: <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=946">Brian Omogrosso</a> (formerly #9, torn labrum), Justin Greene (#19)</p>
<p>Prospects previously ranked, no longer in the system: <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=455">Dexter Carter</a> (#7, traded to SD), <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=457">Jack Egbert</a> (#25, now with NYM)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/10/11/2009-postseason-top-25-prospects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early 2009 Draft Impressions</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/09/early-2009-draft-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/09/early-2009-draft-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FutureSox Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Morgado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Collop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Bellamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Colligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hopps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Buch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Minor League regular season concluded in 2009, FutureSox writers Seven Costanza and Dan Santaromita gave their thoughts and predictions from the 2009 White Sox draft class.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven Costanza and Dan Santaromita gave their thoughts and predictions from the 2009 White Sox draft class.  Each picked their favorite and least favorite draft pick, a sleeper, a bust candidate, the first to make it to the Majors, an unsigned pick that was most disappointing and their overall early thoughts on the draft.</p>
<p><u><strong>Favorite Pick</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Ryan Buch</strong><br />
I think the Sox got great value with Buch in the 8th round. He’s got the potential to become a mid-rotation starter due to his solid three pitch mix of a low to mid 90’s fastball, excellent curve and improving change. The command of his fastball can be erratic which is what could prevent him from reaching his potential but he’s definitely the prime candidate to be next year&#8217;s Dexter Carter or Dan Hudson. I think Buch had value even in the second round so to draft him in the 8th and sign him for slot money looks like a great job by the Sox. Lot’s of projectability here.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Kyle Bellamy</strong><br />
In terms of best value at the round the player was taken, I really like Bellamy. He dominated at Miami in the tough ACC for 2 years and has the stuff and deception with his sidearm delivery to fly through the minors (he is already doing very well in Kannapolis). His high 80s fastball has good sink and his slider is effective. His strikeout to walk ratio is spectacular so far, which is somewhat expected because he was a very advanced reliever out of college. It might be generous to say his upside is as a setup man, but chances are good he will be the first member of this White Sox draft class to make it to the Majors.</p>
<p><u><strong>Least Favorite Pick</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Justin Collop</strong><br />
There are definitely things to like about Collop; he’s athletic, has a fast arm and three workable pitches when he’s on but he’s been very inconsistent, his command isn’t good and his secondary pitches fell off during the second half of the season resulting in Collop getting hit hard. There’s too much uncertainty and not enough upside in Collop for me to call this pick anything other than a reach. I think Collop is the type of prospect that you take a flier on in the 10-14 round range, not the 6th.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Matt Hopps</strong><br />
I&#8217;ll put Hopps in the never to interview with us category. He signed for well under slot and has only been pitching for a few years so there is projectability for his age (23), but I think the odds are against him more than the rest of the top 10 picks. The term least favorite fits best because I don&#8217;t dislike the pick, it was the 9th round after all, but I feel that there is the least to like about Hopps relative to other somewhat high picks.</p>
<p><u><strong>Biggest Sleeper</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Dan Black</strong><br />
The 14th rounder Black hasn’t had the best of results in the early going, but I really like his combination of plus power and fantastic plate discipline. He doesn’t have a position and has been playing a lot of first base, it’s unfortunate that he couldn’t stick at the position he played a lot in college, that being catcher, because then he really would be a prospect. But as it is I believe in the bat, even at first, so hopefully Dan Black doesn’t prove me wrong.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Kyle Colligan</strong><br />
Colligan is an athletic outfielder, something the Sox seemed to grab a lot of this draft, and has done well at Great Falls this year. He did well in the Big 12 at Texas A&#038;M and can play a solid centerfield while hitting for some pop. He&#8217;s been getting on base at a great clip with the Voyagers this season, living up to my own expectations of him. He is an advanced hitter that shouldn&#8217;t have too much trouble with A ball pitching in 2010. I&#8217;m not expecting him to set the world on fire, but he should do well. For a 12th rounder, I think he has the ability to be an under the radar prospect that does well without much notice.</p>
<p><u><strong>Most Likely to Bust</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Trayce Thompson</strong><br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1071">Thompson</a> was probably my second favourite pick of the whole draft behind Buch, but there is a huge amount of bust potential with Trayce. He’s very raw and has a long swing leading to a lot of strikeouts. Those are two big red flags for a prospect, but there is also an awful lot to like about Trayce. If he puts it all together Thompson could become a prototypical right fielder with great power, arm strength and solid defense, however it will almost certainly take him a long time to get there.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Trayce Thompson</strong><br />
He is the highest high schooler the Sox selected and he is widely considered a raw prospect. I love the pick and the upside, but by definition a raw player is more likely to bust than most. He&#8217;s a ways away from the Majors if he gets there so fans will need to be patient with his development. It will be interesting to see if Thompson starts next year in Kannapolis or if the Sox are going to take it slowly with him and have him in extended spring training before rookie ball.</p>
<p><u><strong>First to the Majors</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Kyle Bellamy</strong><br />
Bellamy was a dominant reliever for the Hurricanes. He’s very polished and gets lots of ground balls with a good amount of strikeouts from his two-seam fastball and sweeping slider, both of which he has great command of. He was described by one prospect evaluator as “Death on right handers” and ultimately may have to settle for a job as a ROOGY, although he could potentially become a late inning reliever, possibly even a closer. Unlike last years supposed fast riser Drew O’Neil, Bellamy made light work of rookie ball and I don’t think an assignment to Birmingham for the start of next year would be too aggressive, although Winston-Salem is his more likely destination.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Kyle Bellamy</strong><br />
My reasoning for this is mostly why I said he was my favorite pick. He was a first-team All-American in college and has the stuff to dominate A ball hitters. Great sink on his pitches leads to a great groundball rate and he has been striking guys out so far in the minors. Sidearm guys seem to move quickly in general and I don&#8217;t think Bellamy will be an exception to that.</p>
<p><u><strong>The One That Got Away</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: <strong>Bryan Morgado</strong><br />
There were better prospects that the Sox failed to sign but Morgado would have filled the biggest need, that need being left-handed pitching prospects which aren’t still 4 years away. Morgado struggled a lot with his command while at Tennessee which stopped him pitching up to his stuff (he has a first round arm). The White Sox don’t exactly have the best reputation for developing prospects but they’ve done well just recently and it would have been interesting to see what they could have done with Morgado.</p>
<p>DS: <strong>Justin Jones</strong><br />
Morgado is the easier pick here because he was drafted in the 3rd round, but I really started to like Jones based on the things I was reading about him after the draft. Word was his velocity was improving and he supposedly had a very good curveball. He seemed like a high upside pick for the 7th round, but he probably realized that too and decided college would improve his draft stock 3 years from now. It&#8217;s hard to argue with that and the White Sox have been known to redraft players (Chris Getz, Jordan Danks, Ricky Brooks) so maybe we will see the same with Jones down the road. It seems like the Sox weren&#8217;t going to go over slot on any of their draftees, which is acceptable as long as the talent they did sign makes up for it.</p>
<p><u><strong>Overall Thoughts</strong></u></p>
<p>SC: I liked a lot of picks that were made but I wonder if there’s enough impact talent here because outside of <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=775">Jared Mitchell</a>, Thompson, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=611">Josh Phegley</a> and Buch I don’t see anyone who could become a significantly above average starter. The Sox really could have done with signing one or more of the Justin Jones, Bryan Morgado and Dane Williams trio after dealing a lot of their pitching depth in the Peavy trade, but unfortunately they were not able to, so they will have to wait for either off-season trades or next year&#8217;s draft to plug this hole in the system. I do like the direction that the organisation seems to be taking with their draft mentality, moving away from the “safer” picks such as Broadway and McCulloch a few years ago and moving towards higher risk, higher reward picks such as Mitchell and Thompson.</p>
<p>DS: The Sox clearly went after athletes in this draft. Mitchell, Thompson, Colligan and Nick Ciolli all played center field with their teams this year. The Sox could use some infield depth in the minors now, but it&#8217;s good to see outfield athleticism as a priority. I like David Holmberg and Matt Heidenreich as projectable arms, but there weren&#8217;t any good polished starting pitchers signed by the Sox. Morgado would have been helped that, but I&#8217;m worried about his control. It&#8217;s way too early to say much of anything about this draft in terms of quality yet, but on paper it&#8217;s easier to like the hitters (even in the lower rounds) more than the pitching. Though it will be interesting to see how the top high school picks develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/09/early-2009-draft-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sox Affiliates Ready for Postseason Play</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/08/sox-affiliates-ready-for-postseason-play/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/08/sox-affiliates-ready-for-postseason-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Poreda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Retherford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie leesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Shirek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daisuke Matsuzaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Remenowsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dexter Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Beckham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe McEwing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Serafin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johny Celis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jose Vargas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Phegley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Bellamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Colligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Ciolli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santos Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Loman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Sauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a very successful year for White Sox Minor League affiliates with four of the organizations six U.S. based teams reaching the postseason. I do a brief recap of them all here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a very successful year for White Sox Minor League affiliates with four of the organizations six U.S. based teams reaching the postseason. While the Great Falls Voyagers still have a couple of regular season games left to play before starting their playoff run, the Birmingham Barons, Winston-Salem Dash and Kannapolis Intimidators have all finished their regular season’s and will play their first postseason game either tomorrow or Thursday. </p>
<p>The Birmingham Barons were one of Minor League Baseball’s best teams this year and their 92-47 record was the best in the team’s history. Their roster at the start of the season was stacked with many of the organizations top prospects including Gordon Beckham, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=446">Tyler Flowers</a>, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=432">Brandon Allen</a>, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=441">Dayan Viciedo</a>, Aaron Poreda and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=453">John Shelby</a>, and as you would have expected, they made light work of opposing Southern League teams. Promotions, trades and call-ups removed many of their best players from the first couple of months of the season but they were replaced, and replaced well, by players such as Christian Marrero, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=450">Jordan Danks</a> and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=583">Charlie Shirek</a>, added to that, mainstays such as <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1212">John Ely</a> and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=597">C.J. Retherford</a> ensured that the Barons didn’t skip a beat in the second half. Now ready to make a run for the Southern League crown, the Barons will start their best of 5 series with Jacksonville Suns on Thursday.  </p>
<p>The Winston-Salem Dash make their way into the playoff largely thanks to playing in a very weak Carolina League South. You may think that’s a little unfair, saying they’re only in the playoff due to playing in a weak division, but when you have a 4.30 ERA (2nd worst in the CAR) and are just midpack in runs scored, it’s unlikely that you were a good team. The Dash actually allowed more runs (642) than they scored (626). Winston-Salem’s offense has been led by a personal favourite of mine, Seth Loman, and postseason All-Star at 3B, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1176">Brent Morel</a>, they also have Carolina League manager of the year Joe McEwing in their corner as well as a rotation led by Justin Edwards and Dylan Axelrod. The Dash will play their first postseason game tomorrow night against the Salem Red Sox, who are expected to start Daisuke Matsuzaka, and while anything can and often does happen in the playoffs, don’t expect the Carolina League crown to be coming the Dash’s way.</p>
<p>The Kannapolis Intimidators’ season has been all about their fantastic second half, in which they have a 45-24 record and a .652 winning percentage. Pitching was this team’s M.O. as they led the whole of the South Atlantic League with 530 runs allowed thanks to a rotation fronted by two of this organizations more intriguing starters, Charlie Leesman and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=621">Stephen Sauer</a> (having <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=455">Dexter Carter</a> and Dan Hudson for a time didn’t hurt either). Even with losing one of it’s better arms, Charlis Burdie to the Dash, the Intimidators have one of the most formidable bullpen’s in the Minors, backed by Dan Remonowsky, ’09 draftee Kyle Bellamy and late season promotion Santos Rodriguez. Other ’09 draftees have played large parts in this team’s second half run, most notably two early round picks <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=775">Jared Mitchell</a> and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=611">Josh Phegley</a> but also one later round pick, <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1025">Joe Serafin</a>. The Intimidators will play their first postseason game tomorrow against the Lakewood BlueClaws, with Charlie Leesman getting the start.</p>
<p>The final Sox affiliate to make the playoffs are the defending Pioneer League champions Great Falls, who swept their way past the Orem Owlz in the 2008 championship series behind the arms of Dan Hudson and Dexter Carter. This years Voyagers have been led by a steady dose of pitching and offense where the rank 2nd and 3rd respectively in the Pioneer League. The Voyagers have an old team for a rookie ball affiliate and as it stands Trayce Thompson is the only teen on their roster, he’s also roughly 2 ½ years younger than anyone else on the team, and it is partly for this reason that they don’t appear to be brimmed with future Major Leaguers. The Great Falls Voyagers will call upon it’s offensive stars Jose Vargas, Nick Ciolli, Johny Celis and Kyle Colligan to lead the team to victory when they start their playoff run against the Missoula Osprey’s this Saturday the 12th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/09/08/sox-affiliates-ready-for-postseason-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thompson Signing Official</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/28/thompson-signing-official/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/28/thompson-signing-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Santaromita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Morgado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outfielder Trayce Thompson has signed a contract with the White Sox.  He received a $625,000 signing bonus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>61st overall pick <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1071">Trayce Thompson</a> has signed a contract for $625,000.</p>
<p>The minor surprise is that he signed for just under $30,000 over slot.  The numbers floating around were a little bit higher.  Thompson is the first high draft pick of the White Sox to sign for over slot this year.</p>
<p>It is expected that Thompson will report to Bristol to begin his professional career.  Expectations should be reserved for his opening stint because he was regarded as a very raw player taken on the basis of his impressive upside and potential.</p>
<p>With Thompson&#8217;s signing, the highest remaining unsigned pick is 3rd rounder Bryan Morgado.  Morgado has been doing well in the Cape Cod League this summer.  In 27 innings, he has 39 strikeouts to 12 walks with a 1.67 ERA.  This kind of production will likely require an above slot bonus for Morgado as well.  The estimated slot for Morgado&#8217;s 102nd spot is just under $320,000.  7th rounder Justin Jones, a high school pitcher, also remains unsigned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/28/thompson-signing-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trayce Thompson To Sign</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/26/trayce-thompson-to-sign/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/26/trayce-thompson-to-sign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Santaromita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2nd round pick Trayce Thompson has reportedly agreed to terms, but might be waiting on MLB to approve his above slot contract.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/varsitytimesinsider/2009/07/baseball-thompson-set-to-sign-with-white-sox.html">blog post</a> from the Los Angeles Times, outfielder Trayce Thompson, selected 61st overall, will fly to Chicago this weekend and sign a contract.</p>
<p>Thompson, a 6’4” 200 pound righty, is from Rancho Santa Margarita, California and had committed to UCLA.  He is a high upside pick with a projectable frame.  He is a great athlete that is considered a 5-tool type prospect.  For more information on him, read what <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=144">we said when he was first selected</a>.</p>
<p>Mark Gonzales of the Chicago Tribune is saying <a href="http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2009/07/thompson-would-be-good-catch-for-white-sox-outfield-prospects.html">he will report to Bristol</a>.  It will be interesting to see the signing bonus Thompson will receive because he was thought to be getting an above slot offer.  The slot bonus for the pick is just under $600,000.  It was expected soon after draft day that Thompson would sign, but it was no surprise to see the negotiations take a while.</p>
<p>Thompson was left off of our <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=838">midseason prospect rankings</a> because he hadn&#8217;t signed yet, but would have slotted in at 13th if we included him in our final list.  Thompson could quickly become one of the top prospects in the system.</p>
<p>UPDATE: The weekend has come and gone and there has been no extra word on Thompson, but it&#8217;s common for MLB to sit on above slot signing bonuses until closer to the deadline.  It&#8217;s an odd practice, but it would explain why the contract has not become official yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/26/trayce-thompson-to-sign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Unsigned Draft Pick Update</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/21/2009-draft-update/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/21/2009-draft-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chisoxfn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Goodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Morgado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dane Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FutureSox.com offers a quick update as to the status of some notable unsigned members of the 2009 draft class and helps explain why there has been so little news regarding signings as of late.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FutureSox.com has received a lot of questions over the past couple weeks regarding the status of some of the un-signed picks from the White Sox 2009 draft class.  In fact our readers have also pointed out that there have been very little information on anyone&#8217;s draft picks, including any of the Sox more notable un-signed picks: <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=144">Trayce Thompson</a> (2nd), <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=154">Bryan Morgado</a> (3rd), <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=218">Justin Jones</a> (7th), <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=190">Dane Williams</a> (15th), and <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=190">Brian Goodwin</a> (17th).</p>
<p>The reason for this was <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/ask-ba/2009/268576.html">summed up</a> perfectly by Jim Callis of Baseball America (see below) and each of the players listed above fit into the category describe by Callis (as they are all believed to be asking for &#8220;above slot&#8221;). </p>
<blockquote><p>It has been 12 days since a first-round draft pick signed, and 20 of the 32 have yet to agree to terms. Don&#8217;t expect those numbers to change much in the next two to three weeks. Most if not all of the first-rounders who were going to sign for MLB&#8217;s slot recommendations have done so, and MLB is going to drag its heels on approving deals that far exceed its guidelines.</p></blockquote>
<p>This means that the Sox might have actually reached deals with the prospects in question but those deals have not been announced as the league tends to sit on above-slot offers.  Or the Sox might just be waiting patiently to see if the asking price drops before making their significant offer. </p>
<p>What we can tell you from what we&#8217;ve heard:<br />
- The Sox appear confident that they&#8217;ll be able to sign Trayce Thompson and Justin Jones.  </p>
<p>- Bryan Morgado appears to be a wild-card.  Initially the Sox had felt he&#8217;d be an easy sign as he was a college player without a college (Tennessee wasn&#8217;t going to keep him) but as a draft eligible sophomore who has opened up some scouts&#8217; eyes at the Cape, his contract demands and leverage have been higher than expected.</p>
<p>- Brian Goodwin and Dane Williams will go down to the wire.  The odds aren&#8217;t good, but the Sox are going to give it a fighting shot.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/21/2009-draft-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FutureSox Midseason Top 25 Prospects</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/14/futuresox-midseason-top-25-prospects/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/14/futuresox-midseason-top-25-prospects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FutureSox Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Omogrosso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Retherford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Torres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie leesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Shirek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dexter Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Egbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jhonny Nunez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gilmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Phegley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Gartrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Sauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Upchurch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the White Sox, Knights and Barons on All-Star break, it's time to release our newest prospects rankings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not exactly midseason, but it is the All-Star break for the White Sox and their AAA and AA affiliates so we thought it was time to release our Midseason Top 25 White Sox Prospects.  Similar to how we did our <a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=78">preseason rankings</a>, we had a total of nine FutureSox writers and people who follow the Sox minor league system from our sister site, <a href="http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/">Soxtalk.com</a>, pool their ballots similar to an AP Poll.  Therefore, the rankings are a combination of each of our rankings and don&#8217;t reflect any of our individual opinions.</p>
<p>We included the player&#8217;s rank from our preseason rankings and his range in our ballots.  The ranges show how consistent or inconsistent we were.  Some of our voters love one guy for one reason or another and the rest of us may think he is nuts.  The parentheses after the highest and lowest votes show how many people had that player ranked in that position.</p>
<p>An exciting thing at FutureSox that we have been working on, and teased during the Brandon Allen trade, is our prospect profiles.  They include biographical information, previous FutureSox rankings, scouting reports and other information.  The profiles that we have already created are linked below the player&#8217;s name on this list.  You can also view them by clicking the &#8220;Prospect Profiles&#8221; link at the top of any FutureSox.com page.  We will add more profiles as we go and a few more will be coming soon so check them out!</p>
<p>Leave us some comments and tell us what you think about our rankings or join in the discussion at <a href="http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=73003">Soxtalk</a>.  If you think we are out of our minds, let us know where we screwed up!</p>
<p><strong>1. Tyler Flowers</strong>, C, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 1st (5) to 2nd (4)<br />
Previous rank: 5th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=446">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>2. Dayan Viciedo</strong>, 3B, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 20<br />
Range: 1st (3) to 3rd (3)<br />
Previous: T-2nd<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=441">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>3. Jordan Danks</strong>, CF, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 1st to 4th<br />
Previous: 6th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=450">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>4. Dan Hudson</strong>, RH SP, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 4th (7) to 5th (2)<br />
Previous: 12th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=465">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>5. Jared Mitchell</strong>, OF, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 20<br />
Range: 3rd to 8th<br />
Previous: Not yet in system<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=775">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>6. Dexter Carter</strong>, RH SP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 5th (2) to 14th<br />
Previous: 8th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=455">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>7. John Shelby III</strong>, OF, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 8th to 18th<br />
Previous: 7th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=453">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>8. Josh Phegley</strong>, C, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 21<br />
Range: 7th to 16th<br />
Previous: Not yet in system<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=611">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>9. Brian Omogrosso</strong>, RH SP/RP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 25<br />
Range: 6th to 21st (2)<br />
Previous: 19th</p>
<p><strong>10. Charlie Shirek</strong>, RH SP, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 6th to unranked<br />
Previous: 24th</p>
<p><strong>11. C.J. Retherford</strong>, 3B/2B, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 24<br />
Range: 5th to unranked<br />
Previous: T-25th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=597">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>12. Nathan Jones</strong>, RH RP, High-A Winston-Salem<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 6th to 21st<br />
Previous: 23rd<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=623">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>13. Jon Link</strong>, RH RP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 25<br />
Range: 4th to unranked<br />
Previous: 17th</p>
<p><strong>14. Carlos Torres</strong>, RH SP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 26<br />
Range: 7th to unranked<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>15. Lucas Harrell</strong>, RH SP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 24<br />
Range: 8th to unranked<br />
Previous: 14th</p>
<p><strong>16. Steven Upchurch</strong>, RH SP, Rookie Bristol<br />
Age: 19<br />
Range: 10th to unranked<br />
Previous: 18th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=652">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>17. Brent Morel</strong>, 3B, High-A Winston-Salem<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 9th to unranked<br />
Previous: 11th</p>
<p><strong>18. Justin Greene</strong>, OF, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 17th to unranked (2)<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>19. John Ely</strong>, RH SP, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 10th to unranked (3)<br />
Previous: 20th</p>
<p><strong>20. Charlie Leesman</strong>, LH SP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 9th to unranked (5)<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>21. Jon Gilmore</strong>, 3B, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 20<br />
Range: 14th (2) to unranked (2)<br />
Previous: 22nd</p>
<p><strong>22. Stephen Sauer</strong>, RH SP, Low-A Kannapolis<br />
Age: 22<br />
Range: 13th to uranked (3)<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>23. Stefan Gartrell</strong>, OF, AA Birmingham<br />
Age: 25<br />
Range: 9th to unranked (4)<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><strong>24. Jack Egbert</strong>, RH SP/RP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 26<br />
Range: 11th to unranked (4)<br />
Previous: 9th<br />
<a href="http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=457">Player Profile</a></p>
<p><strong>25. Jhonny Nunez</strong>, RH RP, AAA Charlotte<br />
Age: 23<br />
Range: 12th to unranked (3)<br />
Previous: UR</p>
<p><em>Trayce Thompson</em>, OF*<br />
Age: 18<br />
Range: 7th to unranked<br />
*We included Trayce Thompson in our ballots because we believe he will sign, but since he hasn&#8217;t yet, we won&#8217;t include him in the final rankings.  If we were to include him, he would have slid in at 13th, ahead of Jon Link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/14/futuresox-midseason-top-25-prospects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FutureSox Interview with Kevin Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/08/futuresox-interview-with-kevin-goldstein/</link>
		<comments>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/08/futuresox-interview-with-kevin-goldstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony82087</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayan Viciedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuresox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Beckham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Danks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayce Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futuresox.com/frontpage/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Goldstein, Managing Partner of Baseball Prospectus Entertainment Ventures, and former senior writer for Baseball America, took the time out to speak to FutureSox.com about the Sox minor league system as a whole, as well as specific players currently in the organization.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Goldstein, Managing Partner of Baseball Prospectus Entertainment Ventures, and former senior writer for Baseball America, took the time out to speak to FutureSox.com about the Sox minor league system as a whole, as well as specific players currently in the organization.</p>
<p><strong>Anthony Mazzuca:</strong> Name 1 sleeper in the Sox&#8217;s system that isn&#8217;t a top 5/10 prospect.<br />
<strong>Kevin Goldstein:</strong> Just talked to a scout today who saw Dexter Carter over the weekend and really liked what he saw &#8212; big, very athletic, low 90s with a very good breaking ball, and I still like John Shelby.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Seems like Shelby has sort of taken a step back after a nice 2008&#8230;<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Yeah, Double-A has proven to be a bit much, but he can still play all three outfields, has a good approach, a bit of speed and pop.  I wish he was LH, he&#8217;d have a surefire future as a 4th OF.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Did you expect more out of Jon Gilmore (.600 OPS at Kanny) this season?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> I did, but I really don&#8217;t anymore. That Kannapolis lineup is really ugly, not much to talk about there.</p>
<p><strong>AM:</strong> Let&#8217;s jump to the draft, then come back to some individuals. How did you rank the Sox&#8217;s draft? Best pick and the worst pick?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> I didn&#8217;t do a ranking of the drafts specifically, but in general, I was a big fan of their selections, especially Mitchell and Thompson. I thought they took Phegley too high, but if they believe he really can catch, it&#8217;s understandable. I think what you saw was the continuing shift to tools and upside, a philosophy that Sox officials confirmed to me before the draft.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> How far away is Jared Mitchell? For a polished college player, there seems to be talk of a rather large learning curve.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> He&#8217;s a raw, toolsy college player with a ton of upside, but it will require patience. He&#8217;s certainly not going to move like Beckham, for example.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Incredibly early, but what is the most realistic ETA you could put on it, if everything went right?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Late &#8216;11? Something around there. He&#8217;s a tools guy, and those guys sometimes just click, and when the explode, they move very, very quickly, or it just never happens.There are certainly aspects of his game that need to improve.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Anything in particular?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Well, there&#8217;s a lot of swing and miss in him.  You&#8217;re never going to turn him into Ichiro, but they do need to be curbed, and that&#8217;s going to come with a better plan, and better pitch recognition.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Staying with the overall system, What effect has Buddy Bell had?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> It&#8217;s really hard to give credit (or blame) to any one guy. Success and failure in scouting and player development is really an organizational thing, and you are literally talking about hundreds of people. That said, Bell is very well respected.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> It just seems like the organization, after the 2006 draft, which was a disaster, have really taken a new approach to things, as you touched on earlier.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Yeah, and that&#8217;s system wide. There&#8217;s been changes in personnel and philosophy, and both have been good things.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Staying with the system as a whole, If you were doing a mid-season rank of where the minor league systems are, where would the Sox rank? Just for an idea of where they are, give me a number with and w/o Beckham and Poreda, two guys up with the team right now.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Well, I had them 24th entering the year. Clearly, they&#8217;re up from there. If you include Beckham, Poreda, they&#8217;re definitely in the upper half, a top 15 system, but without them, and now with Allen gone, they more somewhere in the middle, but that&#8217;s for all of the right reasons.</p>
<p><strong>AM:</strong> What is your view on the Brandon Allen trade? Too much for Pena, or have Sox fans maybe overrated what Allen really is?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> It&#8217;s funny, when the trade happened, I went through my notes and found three different scouts who had seen him this year. One thought he was an above-average every day big league first baseman. One thought he was more of a second division player. One thought he was a platoon player at best. So the reviews were really varied.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Could it be a move to open up a spot for Viciedo at 1B?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> It was a move to get a dependable power righty in the pen, I don&#8217;t think they thought much about how it effected other prospects, and Viciedo at first would be pretty troubling, as he&#8217;s not even hitting enough for a third baseman right now.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Any views on Pena himself?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> I do wonder if he&#8217;s really the answer.  On a pure scouting level, he&#8217;s always shined, but the results have always been inconsistent.  I saw it as only a minor upgrade, but you take what you can get.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> I just brought him up, so will stick with him. What kind of future in baseball do you project for Dayan Viciedo?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Honestly, reviews have been very disappointing. Still a bit out of shape, swing at anything approach, not much power.  Because of his age and where he&#8217;s coming from, you have to give him more time than others to make adjustments.  If anything, I think it&#8217;s possible that they just started him at too high a level.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Has there been any talk of the culture change playing a role, or just totally overmatched at the plate?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Specifically on Viciedo, I haven&#8217;t heard that, but with the Cubans, it really is a different kind of culture shock than you get with most international players, and it really does need to be taken into account.  It&#8217;s a massive, massive change in everything about Viciedo&#8217;s world.  But as far as pure baseball goes, the approach is the biggest thing &#8212; he&#8217;s chasing everything.</p>
<p><strong>AM:</strong> Overall, should White Sox fans be generally excited for what is in store for the future, or should we temper our excitement? With the way the farm system has produced in the last 5 years, this looks to be the best crop of prospects the Sox have had in quite some time&#8230;<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Sure, but it was kind of nowhere to go but up, no?<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Very true. I feel like there are a good amount of Sox fans maybe overrating the system because they aren&#8217;t used to having some high end prospects in the system.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Look, I think they should be excited for Beckham alone &#8212; how often to teams develop true stars?  It&#8217;s really pretty rare, but yes, I&#8217;d be much happier than I was.  It&#8217;s not an elite system, but there&#8217;s some good stuff here.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Tyler Flowers. Should he be close to untouchable? Is he going to stay behind the plate?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> You know, I&#8217;ve never been a fan of the term untouchable.  Is anyone REALLY untouchable?  If the Jays wanted him in Halladay deal, wouldn&#8217;t you want the Sox to do that?<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> That&#8217;s why I wont say totally untouchable. If Pujols was offered for Beckham, he isn&#8217;t untouchable anymore.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> I think the catching future is still debatable, he&#8217;s just so huge a sluggish back there. That said, there has been some progress &#8212; they&#8217;ve shortened his release a bit, and the results are encouraging.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Would his bat alone still project him to be a plus major league hitter?(if he had to move out of catcher)<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Yes, the bat is going to play.</p>
<p><strong>AM:</strong> Whats your take overall on the Halladay news over the last 48 hours?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Well, it makes sense for the Jays certainly, with this year AND 2010 under contract, his value is about as high as it can be, and he&#8217;s going to leave Toronto, so I do think there&#8217;s a good chance he&#8217;ll get moved.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Will the Sox be in it, even with Williams comments yesterday about lacking attendance?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> I would saw they&#8217;re in the race, but not a favorite.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> What type of package would it have to be?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> It would be a ton. I think they&#8217;d ask for Beckham for sure, but if that was off the table, they would probably need at least two, maybe three of Poreda/Flowers/Danks.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> If you are the Sox, do you pull the trigger on a deal with those 3?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Would I?  Probably.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Take on Jordan Danks?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> What&#8217;s not to like? Big, athletic, good approach, gap power, good runner, plays a nice CF. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll ever be a true power guy, but I think he&#8217;ll be a solid every day center fielder, which is pretty good for an organization that has been absolutely desperate for one for a long time now.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> Top of the order guy?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Yeah, could be an ideal No. 2 hitter type.</p>
<p><strong>AM:</strong> Changing the topic a bit, How do professional organizations view your publication? What feedback have you received?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> They all read us, and like anything else, some like us, some don&#8217;t.  We&#8217;re certainly a highly respected name in the industry, I think our work speaks for itself, and teams take my calls, so there&#8217;s that. I talk to tons of scouts on an anonymous level (pretty much every day) about what they&#8217;re seeing and what they think.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> What is your relationship with the Sox in general?<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> Solid. I  talk to White Sox scouts and front office people on a regular basis.<br />
<strong>AM:</strong> That actually should just about do it from my end. Can&#8217;t thank you enough for taking out the time.<br />
<strong>KG:</strong> More than happy to help.</p>
<p>We again would like to thank Kevin Goldstein for providing us with some great information on the entire White Sox organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://futuresox.com/frontpage/2009/07/08/futuresox-interview-with-kevin-goldstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
